cookie diet review yoplait diet plan 17 day diet diabetes diet easy diet
Saturday, 30 June 2012
Diabetes Returns in One-Fifth of Those Cured Through Bariatric Surgery
Many people who undergo bariatric procedures for weight loss like gastric bypass surgery, LAP band surgery, or gastric sleeve surgery enjoy drastic weight loss along with the elimination of many weight related diseases. Having a form of bariatric surgery happens to be one of the top ways to cure type 2 diabetes. As many as [...]
3 Best Ways To Lose Abdominal Weight
Are you trying to lose abdominal fat? I have detailed three of the best ways to lose this stubborn fat below.
Hula Hooping – Hula hooping for 5 to 15 minutes a day will not only be enough cardio to burn fat, but it is also tones the entire mid-section. This includes the back, waist, hips, butt, legs, arms, neck, and of course the abdominal muscles. It’s best to start out slow by trying to hula hoop for about 5 minutes a day. After you are comfortable with this you can increase the amount to 10 minutes and so on. It is not as easy as it looks. A good tip is to do this to music instead. A typical song will last about 3 minutes so you can hula hoop to your favorite songs everyday and you’ll be on your way to losing your abdominal weight. I must remind you though, that I am not talking about the cheap plastic hula hoops that kids might play with. In order to get the most from this exercise you should try to purchase a weighted hula hoop.
Hot Lemon Water – Believe it or not but one cup of hot water with lemon every morning will help to flush fat fast. Plus will boost your immune system thanks to the vitamin C. Do this every morning for a month and you will see a big difference. You could also drink a cup before bed to quicken results. Another technique is to add organic (very important) maple syrup and a small dash of cayenne pepper to your ‘mix’ if you want to increase your benefits. The organic maple syrup will help with blood sugar leveling while cayenne pepper is know for its metabolism boosting properties. Drinking these will help to get the most from your fat flushing combo.
Don’t Eat Late – Try not to east past 9 pm. However depending on your sleep patterns you may not want to eat after 5 pm. It you want the fastest results try to avoid eating at least 4 hours before bed. Some experts recommend not eating carbs after 12 noon. However, this will be difficult for many of you, but doing this will make the biggest difference if your weight loss plan. You can also take appetite suppressants to aid you with this. Also, drinking lots of water will help with this as well. If you must eat try to make sure it is vegetables or something similar. For example, carrots with ranch or celery with peanut butter or maybe a salad. Another choice to fulfill your late night hunger is a good protein bar or light soup.
There are several ways to lose abdominal weight but these are three that I have found to be the most helpful and easiest to implement. Add these techniques to your current weight loss plan and you will be sure to get faster results and start losing that abdominal weight.
Carolyn Webb is a weight loss expert. She has lost over 60 lbs using her secret weight loss tactics.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WeightLossEasily/~3/NdQ6ueMpDKg/3-best-ways-to-lose-abdominal-weight
crash diet oatmeal diet diet.com how to diet best detox diet
Lose Baby Weight Fast and Naturally
Your pregnancy is over and you gave birth to the most beautiful baby you had ever set eyes on. You are gradually gaining back something like a routine, and it’s time to re-gain your before-pregnancy body, if not better! Well, you need not struggle to lose those baby weights. Here are 5 proven steps to lose your baby weight fast and look great all over again!
1. Breastfeed.
Women who breastfeed will actually lose weight faster than those who don’t. As long as you eat varied and well balanced, breastfeeding can help you lose your baby weight without compromising either your health or your baby’s health by dieting. Breastfeeding burns 600 to 800 calories a day, so even if all you do is sit comfortably and nurse your baby, you can still naturally burn calories to make breast milk every time you nurse.
2. Take plenty of naps.
Get plenty of sleep. Sleep deprivation increases levels of a hunger hormone and reduces levels of a hormone that makes you feel full. The effects may lead to overeating and weight gain. Thus nap and sleep whenever the baby does. The last thing you want is to end up with a long-term sleep deficit. Sufficient sleep keeps your energy level high and makes you feel good. It also keep those potentially naughty cravings away!
3. Get moving and exercise.
Being a new mom, you’ll probably be too sleep-deprived and overwhelmed with learning to take care of your tiny infant to even think of exercise. However being active and exercising is more crucial than ever. Exercises helps elevate metabolism, lose the extra weight and helps you reduce stress and tension. Start with low-impact exercise, like walking, yoga or swimming for 20 to 30 minutes. A good suggestion would be pushing your baby in the stroller for 30 minutes at the neighborhood park. That can help you burn some good solid calories and lose the baby weight!
4. Watch what you eat.
Fill your diet with a variety of nutrient-rich meals containing lean protein, whole grains, fresh fruits and vegetables and plenty of low-fat dairy products. Say no to junk food and empty-calorie foods like sodas and chips, they do more ham than good anyway. Simply put, increase the intake of “good” carbohydrates and reduce the “bad” carbohydrates. As the saying goes, you are what you eat.
5. Drink lots of water.
Drinking water and weight loss are directly related to each other. Water is very important in helping you to lose your baby weight. Water helps to lose weight by boosting your metabolism rate, thus paving way for quick weight loss. Instead of eating junk food between meals, drinking no or low calorie drinks is filling enough without adding pounds. Drinking a glass of water will usually greatly reduce any false hunger pangs. Furthermore, the process of burning calories requires an adequate supply of water in order to function efficiently; dehydration slows down the fat-burning process.
Work toward a gradual weight loss, eat healthy food when you’re hungry, and make sure you get enough water. Include physical activity in your daily routine and sleep whenever you can. It’s the best way of losing weight easily and safely. Losing baby weight after pregnancy takes time, but with determination and discipline it is possible.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WeightLossEasily/~3/Wxq6rsBmyE4/lose-baby-weight-fast-and-naturally
diet articles hcg diet blog lemonade diet no fat diet the grapefruit diet
Supreme Court ACA ruling: implications for food politics
The Supreme Court ruling that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is indeed constitutional means that Americans will now have greater access to health care as well as to services to help prevent disease.
The American Public Health Association summarizes the benefits:
- 31 million Americans are projected to gain health coverage by 2019
- 54 million U.S. families have additional benefits, including greater access to preventive health care services
- 2.5 million young adults up to age 26 are able to stay on their parents’ health insurance plans;
- nearly 18 million children with pre-existing conditions are protected from insurance coverage denials;
- seniors can access preventive services
Let’s add menu labeling to the list. The ACA takes menu labeling national. The FDA proposed the rules for this process more than a year ago, with no further action.
The Supreme Court says go for it.
FDA: No more excuses. Get busy!
Source: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2012/06/supreme-court-aca-ruling-implications-for-food-politics/
fbf diet bariatric surgery diet diet software cholesterol free diet my hcg diet
Does Dieting Increase Diabetes Risk?
That's certainly the message that HAES practitioner Linda Bacon wanted her followers to believe. In fact her tweet suggests that "even short periods of calorie restriction" increase diabetes risk.
In case you're not familiar with Dr. Bacon her work challenges the assumptions made about obesity and she has been highly critical of studies linking obesity with morbidity and mortality.
In an interview she gave to Med Journal Watch she explains why she believes not everyone agrees with her conclusions,
"My experience from having worked closely with many obesity researchers who are more conventionally-minded than me is that they are so strongly mired in their assumptions, that they don't look at the evidence."And now back to diabetes and dieting, the story of which in this case begins back in time during the Dutch famine of World War II which they not so affectionately call the Hongerwinter (hunger winter).
It was September 1944. The Germans blockaded Holland and cut off food and fuel shipments to punish the Dutch people who opposed the Nazi regime. Food stocks dwindled. By the end of November rations amounted to fewer than 1,000 calories a day, and by February, to 580. 4.5 million people suffered, and over 22,000 perished. At the famine's worst daily rations amounted to half of a medium sized potato and 2 slices of bread. To compound matters, fuel was nearly impossible to come by and despite frigid winter temperatures, gas, heat and electricity were turned off. The famine lasted until May 1945.
Can you imagine being a child in Holland during the famine? The suffering and the horror they must have felt are unfathomable and when coupled with the severe and prolonged under-nutrition they experienced perhaps it's no surprise that their cohort have seen increases in risk of a variety of medical conditions including type 2 diabetes. It's their experiences that Dr. Bacon uses as the source for her diabetes related caution against dieting.
The link Dr. Bacon provided in her assertive tweet about dieting and type 2 diabetes risk led to a a paper entitled, "Famine Exposure in the Young and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Adulthood". In it researchers studied 7,557 Dutch women who endured the Hongerwinter and who on average were 9 years old when it occurred. Subjects were stratified into 3 groups on the basis of their self-reported exposure to famine - none, moderate and severe. The researchers found a small and statistically significant increase in risk to those women who reported themselves as moderately or severely affected by famine and this risk, while slightly attenuated, persisted after controlling for age at start of famine, education, BMI, waist circumference and waist to hip ratio.
The authors also noted that their study was unable to distinguish whether or not this association was related to under-nutrition or to famine related stress and point readers to a Finnish study that found a similar increase in lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes associating with the results of a psychological stress test in childhood war evacuees.
So in the end it would seem that from reading the evidence enduring a moderate to severe famine at a young age increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes perhaps by way of the impact of under-nutrition, or perhaps by way of the impact of psychological stress, or perhaps by another as yet not elucidated cause.
In no way shape or form does this data suggest that "dieting" increases the risk of type 2 diabetes and in no way shape or form is suffering through a famine where daily rations include 2 small slices of bread and half a potato fairly described as a "short period of calorie restriction".
For Dr. Bacon this seems to be a bit of a pattern - slam conventional researchers for being, "so strongly mired in their assumptions that they don't look at the evidence", and then be so strongly mired in her assumptions that either she herself doesn't look at the evidence, or if she does her confirmation bias is so powerful that she'll happily find a way to present it to fit her narrative (click here for more examples). When I questioned her about this particular example on Twitter, despite her battle cry on Huffington Post of, "Show me the data we demand, and you should, too", she blocked me.
A few days ago dietitian and HAES advocate Julie Rochefort asked me on Twitter what barriers I saw to mobilizing HAES into practice. The main one I see seems to be regularly reflected by Dr. Bacon - knee jerk anger and either the willful manipulation of evidence, or a lack of critical appraisal of data so long as it seems to fit the HAES storyline.
Dr. Bacon is certainly HAES' most visible champion and role model. Responding to criticism with anger and manipulating or simply not critically evaluating HAES friendly data undermines the credibility of HAES as a whole, makes HAES easier for detractors to dismiss, and sets an absolutely terrible example for HAES practitioners and supporters to follow.
Annet van Abeelen, Sjoerd Elias, Patrick Bossuyt, Diederick Grobbee, Yvonne van der Schouw, Tessa Roseboom, & Cuno Uiterwaal (2012). Famine Exposure in the Young and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Adulthood Diabetes DOI: 10.2337/db11-1559
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/fLgR/~3/Olk5DoH6YBE/does-dieting-increase-diabetes-risk.html
diet food cholesterol diet plan diet delivery good diet plans almased diet plan
Book Review: The Paleo Diet Budget Shopping Guide
I sometimes hear people claim that eating a Paleo diet is too pricey for them or their family, and that price is an obstacle when trying to improve their eating habits. The idea that this style of eating is substantially more expensive is a misconception that can prevent many from changing their diet to a more healthful one. In order to dispel this myth and teach people how to make a Paleo diet affordable, Robb Wolf has written a useful e-book called The Paleo Diet Budget Shopping Guide.
As Robb explains in his book, this style of eating can be made much more, or much less, expensive than any other diet. In the first part of this e-book, Robb tackles all the common excuses he hears from clients as to why they are unable to afford a Paleo diet, such as a too-tight budget, poor availability of specialty stores, and an overall lack of time to cook. Robb gives practical advice on how to plan meals in order to save time and money, and provides a great number of resources to help plan meals, organize recipes, and develop shopping lists.
There are some great cooking videos and demonstrations by Paleo bloggers and chefs, which teach everything from how to cook basic recipes, proper knife skills, and even using a slow cooker effectively. Sample menus with recipes are provided, and Robb has also put together a great list of pantry, fridge, and freezer “must haves” in order to maximize your kitchen’s utility.
Robb gives some great tips on how to make ingredients stretch between meals to minimize waste and excess purchasing. He advocates weekly meal planning and theme meals, particularly for readers that have children and struggle to keep their family happy with the food they put on the table. There are some creative, kid-friendly meal ideas that will help parents avoid dinner table drama when making inexpensive Paleo food.
Some of the most useful components of this guide are the money saving tips that Robb has devised, such as price journaling, favoring whole products rather than pre-prepped, buying in bulk or direct from a farm, and freezing extra produce and meat for long term storage. He also gives great advice on how to prioritize food quality when money is tight, since there is a lot of “greenwashing” that goes on in grocery stores in order to raise prices on items that are no better than a conventional product. Often times words like “natural” and “free-range” are used to make products appear better, but Robb cuts through the green lingo to help the reader prioritize his or her spending, especially for animal products.
Besides all the advice from Robb himself, he also provides a handy list of resources to help get the best bang for your buck when buying and cooking food. He provides Paleo recipes, recommended brands, links to helpful blogs, and informative videos to teach the reader the best way to make delicious, healthy meals without breaking the bank. There are several shopping and meal planning guides in this e-book to help organize and track one’s food spending for the week. Plus, Robb gives his recommendations for apps to use for those readers who prefer a more technologically advanced method of budgeting their weekly diet.
While some folks are lucky enough not to worry about the price of their food, there are many out there who truly must stay within a strict budget when choosing their meals. Fortunately, Robb’s guide is an inexpensive but useful tool for anyone looking to make the switch to Paleo without going broke. I encourage anyone who’s struggling to afford this dietary change to check out Robb’s e-book for some useful tools for saving money while still improving one’s diet.
Now, thanks to Robb, there’s no more excuses for not eating healthily! CLICK HERE to learn more about The Paleo Diet Budget Shopping Guide.
Note: I earn a small commission if you use the links in this article to purchase the products I mentioned. I only recommend products I would use myself or that I use with patients in my practice. Your purchase helps support this site and my ongoing research.
Source: http://chriskresser.com/book-review-the-paleo-diet-budget-shopping-guide
healthy diet mediterranean diet diet plan liquid diet dieting
Friday, 29 June 2012
Is “Fat Power” an Idea Whose Time Is Coming?
(CC) Tobyotter/Flickr
When They Start Singing “We Shall Overeat,” Look Out
According to the CDC, 35.7 percent of U.S. adults are obese. Depending on whose figures you use, they are merely one segment of the 61.5 to 69 percent of Americans who are, to varying degrees, clinically overweight. Most experts settle at 66 percent.
Given the current U.S. population of 312 million, that works out to about 206 million obese or overweight people. Eliminate the roughly 25 percent of the population who are under 18, and you get about 154 million obese or overweight adults in the land of the free and the well-fed. That’s a pretty hefty number, absolutely no pun intended, and at least for me, it raises a fascinating question, as follows.
Why isn’t the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance (NAAFA) the largest political interest group in the country?
Why isn’t it one of the most powerful? Why doesn’t it have a lobby so financially juiced and aggressive and intimidating that it makes the NRA look like a scrapbooking club? If just one in 10 of the NAAFA’s potential members — i.e. those weighing more than average — signed on for dues of say, five bucks a month, you’re looking at $75 million coming in every four weeks, month after month.
That kind of money buys a lot of Acceptance, at least from members of Congress. As we have seen time and again, there is almost no hoop that our beloved elected representatives will not happily jump through to please big-time campaign donors. For the right kind of financial consideration, they could pass legislation forbidding airlines from charging plus-size passengers extra, or for that matter, could require the airlines to outfit all their planes with wider seats.
Senators would be elbowing one another aside to be the first to introduce legislation outlawing all forms of discrimination based on extreme girth.
But if the NAAFA has any official agenda that it is promoting in the nation’s capital, or anywhere else, they’ve certainly managed to remain low-key about it. Not to get too first-personal, but I’m a fairly avid follower of current events via newspaper, magazine and TV, and yet if I were not a regular contributor to CalorieLab, and thus always on the lookout for items regarding diet and weight loss, I don’t think I would have ever heard of the organization. An organization, mind you, with a larger natural constituency than the NAACP.
So, the answer to “Why aren’t the overweight flocking to join NAAFA?” may simply be that the vast majority have no idea that it exists. But the organization has been around since 1969, and was the subject of considerable media coverage upon its 40th anniversary, and yet it has only about 12,000 members. There are bagpipe appreciation clubs with larger memberships.
It might be that the general overweight population is not all that enthusiastic about the Acceptance concept. If most overweight individuals genuinely accepted their condition, Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig would be little more than obscure cults, and the “Diets” section of your Barnes & Noble wouldn’t be much bigger than the “Witchcraft” section.
Or, the problem with NAAFA recruitment may be the F-word. Fat.
Since we brought up the NAACP, let’s note that it’s an acronym for National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The word “Colored,” I suspect, was not idly chosen. As a vague euphemism for “dark skinned,” it covers a lot of dermatological territory. And “colored” was the politically acceptable racial adjective for decades. Not until the 1960s did the movement for racial equality invoke the B word. Black. As in Black Power.
It may be that NAAFA has invoked its version of Black right out of the starting gate. And perhaps many of is potential members are not quite ready, for a variety of reasons, to explicitly identify themselves as Fat. A National Association to Advance Overweight Acceptance, by comparison, sounds far more conciliatory and sympathetic — after all, who isn’t to some extent overweight? Fat, on the other hand, sounds… fat. It calls forth visions of people weighing north of 350 pounds wearing unflattering shorts, tank tops and bathing suits. It’s not exactly a “Where do I sign up?” image.
But perhaps the NAAFA is, even after 43 years, simply still ahead of its time, and it’s only a matter of time before the weight liberation movement reaches the “Say it loud, I’m fat and I’m proud” point. But if it ever does reach that point, hang on to your hats. When the obese start marching, you don’t want to be in their way.
One more thing: I am still puzzled by the extent of weightism, by which I mean prejudice, discrimination or unfair treatment directed against the overweight. If two-thirds of the country is in fact composed of overweight Americans, how is weightism possible? Don’t get me wrong: it is clearly not only possible but goes on all the time, in everything from hiring practices to medical fees to clothing costs to child custody hearings to club memberships. Anti-fat prejudice is a fact. But it’s a fact that flies in the face of simple arithmetic.
A clear majority being treated like an unpopular minority just doesn’t make sense. The NAAFA should look into that. It might be the basis for a terrific recruiting campaign. Possible slogan: “We are the 66 percenters!”
(By Robert S. Wieder for CalorieLab Calorie Counter News):
Ed. note: Enjoyed this post? Click the “Like” button below and be sure to “Like” the CalorieLab Facebook page.
Is “Fat Power” an Idea Whose Time Is Coming? is a post from: CalorieLab - Health News & Information Blog
Source: http://calorielab.com/news/2012/06/06/is-fat-power-an-idea-whose-time-is-coming/
pregnancy diet diets that work diet menu diet programs best diet
SickKids Foundation President Defends Junk Food Fundraising
So last Monday I blogged about how SickKids Foundation was hypocritically normalizing eating out and encouraging the consumption of junk food in the name of raising money to combat childhood obesity .
I sent my post over to SickKids Foundation president Ted Garrard and he was kind enough to send me a response as well as give me permission to post it.
Basically Mr. Garrard's position is that because those same institutions that are inviting people to purchase such things as onion rings, pizzas, cookies, desserts, Chinese take out have "low fat" items too, that it's alright.
To me that's the food industry apologists' version of the, "but I was just following orders" argument.
Have a read, and if you're interested in sending your thoughts to Mr. Garrard, you can do so by clicking here, or leave a comment on the blog as I'm hopeful the Foundation will be reading,
Dear Dr. Freedhoff,
Thank you for your e-mail and for taking an interest in our first-ever Healthy & Happy campaign. We take all comments and feedback seriously.
In your recent blog about SickKids, you allude to several cause marketing relationships linked to our current campaign. These are valued corporate partners of SickKids Foundation who have come on board to help us raise critical funds for The Hospital for Sick Children.
These corporate sponsors offer a wide range of food and beverage choices, including low-fat options for the health conscious consumer. These are also family-friendly retailers and restaurants and we believe their customers align with our target demographic for this campaign. We believe that important components of a healthy and happy lifestyle include making healthy food choices, being active, being mindful of portion sizes and all things in moderation.
That said, we will take feedback like yours into consideration as we move forward with planning next year’s Healthy & Happy campaign.
The Healthy & Happy effort is based on one simple premise – every child deserves to be healthy and happy. Ultimately we are trying to create a platform to discuss the seriousness of child health issues while reflecting the spirit of happiness which we believe is so important for all children. It is meant to be a positive and feel good experience for anyone who is touched by our campaign. If you visit our site at www.dothehappy.com you will see the positive influence this campaign is having for families who rely on SickKids every day.
Please know that we appreciate and value your perspective, and I want to thank you again for your feedback.
Ted
Does Dieting Increase Diabetes Risk?
That's certainly the message that HAES practitioner Linda Bacon wanted her followers to believe. In fact her tweet suggests that "even short periods of calorie restriction" increase diabetes risk.
In case you're not familiar with Dr. Bacon her work challenges the assumptions made about obesity and she has been highly critical of studies linking obesity with morbidity and mortality.
In an interview she gave to Med Journal Watch she explains why she believes not everyone agrees with her conclusions,
"My experience from having worked closely with many obesity researchers who are more conventionally-minded than me is that they are so strongly mired in their assumptions, that they don't look at the evidence."And now back to diabetes and dieting, the story of which in this case begins back in time during the Dutch famine of World War II which they not so affectionately call the Hongerwinter (hunger winter).
It was September 1944. The Germans blockaded Holland and cut off food and fuel shipments to punish the Dutch people who opposed the Nazi regime. Food stocks dwindled. By the end of November rations amounted to fewer than 1,000 calories a day, and by February, to 580. 4.5 million people suffered, and over 22,000 perished. At the famine's worst daily rations amounted to half of a medium sized potato and 2 slices of bread. To compound matters, fuel was nearly impossible to come by and despite frigid winter temperatures, gas, heat and electricity were turned off. The famine lasted until May 1945.
Can you imagine being a child in Holland during the famine? The suffering and the horror they must have felt are unfathomable and when coupled with the severe and prolonged under-nutrition they experienced perhaps it's no surprise that their cohort have seen increases in risk of a variety of medical conditions including type 2 diabetes. It's their experiences that Dr. Bacon uses as the source for her diabetes related caution against dieting.
The link Dr. Bacon provided in her assertive tweet about dieting and type 2 diabetes risk led to a a paper entitled, "Famine Exposure in the Young and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Adulthood". In it researchers studied 7,557 Dutch women who endured the Hongerwinter and who on average were 9 years old when it occurred. Subjects were stratified into 3 groups on the basis of their self-reported exposure to famine - none, moderate and severe. The researchers found a small and statistically significant increase in risk to those women who reported themselves as moderately or severely affected by famine and this risk, while slightly attenuated, persisted after controlling for age at start of famine, education, BMI, waist circumference and waist to hip ratio.
The authors also noted that their study was unable to distinguish whether or not this association was related to under-nutrition or to famine related stress and point readers to a Finnish study that found a similar increase in lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes associating with the results of a psychological stress test in childhood war evacuees.
So in the end it would seem that from reading the evidence enduring a moderate to severe famine at a young age increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes perhaps by way of the impact of under-nutrition, or perhaps by way of the impact of psychological stress, or perhaps by another as yet not elucidated cause.
In no way shape or form does this data suggest that "dieting" increases the risk of type 2 diabetes and in no way shape or form is suffering through a famine where daily rations include 2 small slices of bread and half a potato fairly described as a "short period of calorie restriction".
For Dr. Bacon this seems to be a bit of a pattern - slam conventional researchers for being, "so strongly mired in their assumptions that they don't look at the evidence", and then be so strongly mired in her assumptions that either she herself doesn't look at the evidence, or if she does her confirmation bias is so powerful that she'll happily find a way to present it to fit her narrative (click here for more examples). When I questioned her about this particular example on Twitter, despite her battle cry on Huffington Post of, "Show me the data we demand, and you should, too", she blocked me.
A few days ago dietitian and HAES advocate Julie Rochefort asked me on Twitter what barriers I saw to mobilizing HAES into practice. The main one I see seems to be regularly reflected by Dr. Bacon - knee jerk anger and either the willful manipulation of evidence, or a lack of critical appraisal of data so long as it seems to fit the HAES storyline.
Dr. Bacon is certainly HAES' most visible champion and role model. Responding to criticism with anger and manipulating or simply not critically evaluating HAES friendly data undermines the credibility of HAES as a whole, makes HAES easier for detractors to dismiss, and sets an absolutely terrible example for HAES practitioners and supporters to follow.
Annet van Abeelen, Sjoerd Elias, Patrick Bossuyt, Diederick Grobbee, Yvonne van der Schouw, Tessa Roseboom, & Cuno Uiterwaal (2012). Famine Exposure in the Young and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Adulthood Diabetes DOI: 10.2337/db11-1559
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/fLgR/~3/Olk5DoH6YBE/does-dieting-increase-diabetes-risk.html
coffee diet your hcg diet best diet plans mediteranian diet hcg diet shots
Thursday, 28 June 2012
Book Review: It Starts With Food
It Starts With Food will be released June 12, 2012 – pre-order your copy here!
Dallas and Melissa Hartwig of Whole9 have truly outdone themselves with this book. If you are looking for a book that covers all the basics of a healthy diet, do yourself a favor and read it. It Starts With Food also makes a perfect gift for someone in your life who wants to get their health back on track.
It Starts With Food details the science and reasoning behind the Whole30 program, and Melissa and Dallas have mastered the science. Filled with great analogies to make these complicated processes relatable, you’ll walk away knowing exactly how your body works and what foods will and will not make you healthier. As the Hartwigs say, “The food you eat either makes you more healthy or less healthy. Those are your options.” Choosing your food wisely is critical, and the Hartwigs show you exactly how to do it.
Dallas and Melissa have developed a set of standards for which all food on the Whole30 must fit into. They call these the Good Food Standards, which state:
The foods we eat should:
- Promote a healthy psychological response.
- Promote a healthy hormonal response.
- Support a healthy gut.
- Support immune function and minimize inflammation.
The Hartwigs nailed it on this one – good food should indeed do all these things, and by eating good food we can achieve good health. Dallas and Melissa go over each of these standards in detail and teach you exactly what foods do – and do not – fit in.
It Starts With Food also covers meal planning (and makes it incredibly easy), teaches you how to reintroduce foods, and a includes a whole chapter devoted to achieving long-term success with their program (which offers a few much-needed pages on getting support from your friends and family, or dealing with those who don’t support you). They also provide a chapter about making the program work for you if you have a condition which warrants further dietary concerns, like IBS/IBD, autoimmune conditions, and food allergies. Lastly, you’ll find the Meal Map – a fantastic resource for making easy and delicious meals throughout your Whole30 program.
It Starts With Food is a wonderful resource for anyone looking to fine-tune their health. The Hartwigs will challenge you, teach you, make you laugh, and most importantly, change your life.
Note: I earn a small commission if you use the links in this article to purchase the products I mentioned. I only recommend products I would use myself or that I use with patients in my practice. Your purchase helps support this site and my ongoing research.
Source: http://chriskresser.com/book-review-it-starts-with-food
cholesterol diet menu diets for women diabetic diet diabetes diets diabetic diet menu
Book Review: The Paleo Diet Budget Shopping Guide
I sometimes hear people claim that eating a Paleo diet is too pricey for them or their family, and that price is an obstacle when trying to improve their eating habits. The idea that this style of eating is substantially more expensive is a misconception that can prevent many from changing their diet to a more healthful one. In order to dispel this myth and teach people how to make a Paleo diet affordable, Robb Wolf has written a useful e-book called The Paleo Diet Budget Shopping Guide.
As Robb explains in his book, this style of eating can be made much more, or much less, expensive than any other diet. In the first part of this e-book, Robb tackles all the common excuses he hears from clients as to why they are unable to afford a Paleo diet, such as a too-tight budget, poor availability of specialty stores, and an overall lack of time to cook. Robb gives practical advice on how to plan meals in order to save time and money, and provides a great number of resources to help plan meals, organize recipes, and develop shopping lists.
There are some great cooking videos and demonstrations by Paleo bloggers and chefs, which teach everything from how to cook basic recipes, proper knife skills, and even using a slow cooker effectively. Sample menus with recipes are provided, and Robb has also put together a great list of pantry, fridge, and freezer “must haves” in order to maximize your kitchen’s utility.
Robb gives some great tips on how to make ingredients stretch between meals to minimize waste and excess purchasing. He advocates weekly meal planning and theme meals, particularly for readers that have children and struggle to keep their family happy with the food they put on the table. There are some creative, kid-friendly meal ideas that will help parents avoid dinner table drama when making inexpensive Paleo food.
Some of the most useful components of this guide are the money saving tips that Robb has devised, such as price journaling, favoring whole products rather than pre-prepped, buying in bulk or direct from a farm, and freezing extra produce and meat for long term storage. He also gives great advice on how to prioritize food quality when money is tight, since there is a lot of “greenwashing” that goes on in grocery stores in order to raise prices on items that are no better than a conventional product. Often times words like “natural” and “free-range” are used to make products appear better, but Robb cuts through the green lingo to help the reader prioritize his or her spending, especially for animal products.
Besides all the advice from Robb himself, he also provides a handy list of resources to help get the best bang for your buck when buying and cooking food. He provides Paleo recipes, recommended brands, links to helpful blogs, and informative videos to teach the reader the best way to make delicious, healthy meals without breaking the bank. There are several shopping and meal planning guides in this e-book to help organize and track one’s food spending for the week. Plus, Robb gives his recommendations for apps to use for those readers who prefer a more technologically advanced method of budgeting their weekly diet.
While some folks are lucky enough not to worry about the price of their food, there are many out there who truly must stay within a strict budget when choosing their meals. Fortunately, Robb’s guide is an inexpensive but useful tool for anyone looking to make the switch to Paleo without going broke. I encourage anyone who’s struggling to afford this dietary change to check out Robb’s e-book for some useful tools for saving money while still improving one’s diet.
Now, thanks to Robb, there’s no more excuses for not eating healthily! CLICK HERE to learn more about The Paleo Diet Budget Shopping Guide.
Note: I earn a small commission if you use the links in this article to purchase the products I mentioned. I only recommend products I would use myself or that I use with patients in my practice. Your purchase helps support this site and my ongoing research.
Source: http://chriskresser.com/book-review-the-paleo-diet-budget-shopping-guide
diet bars high fiber diet no carb diet hcg injection diet healthy weight loss
“Vibrant Moms Healthy Kids” Offers Family-Focused Nutrition Training Online
“How do I get my kid to eat healthy food?” This is the number one question Abra Pappa has received over the last ten years as a Certified Health Coach and a Holistic Nutritionist. She’s decided to take a brand new approach to answer that question and is introducing a program called Vibrant Moms Healthy [...]
hypothyroidism diet diet and nutrition diet meals delivered hcg diet reviews original hcg diet
How to Lose Baby Weight
If you are a celebrity who’s just had a baby, you probably don’t need to read this article on how to lose baby weight. It seems that celebrity moms possess some magical formula that allows them to lose all their baby weight within 8 weeks of childbirth.
Until those moms release their secrets, we have to rely on good old-fashioned healthy eating and exercise. Unfortunately, new moms soon find out that it not as easy to lose weight as it was pre-baby because of a lack of time and energy.
New moms need to give themselves some slack and not expect a huge amount of weight loss in the first few months. If you’re breastfeeding, you’ll find that some of your weight will melt away as you nurse your baby but if you continue to eat the way you did when you were pregnant, then you will quickly gain that weight back. At least, that’s what happened to me.
The first step you should take is to record what you are eating every day for a week. Eat what you normally eat and record the calorie counts. Then the following week, decide how much you want to lose per week ( a pound or a ½ pound) and cut 500 calories a day from your diet, whether it’s from what you eat or how much you exercise or a combination of the two.
One pound equals 3500 calories, so to lose one pound every week, you need to cut 500 calories per day (500 x 7 = 3500). If this is too much, cut 250 a day and you’ll lose half a pound per week.
Cutting calories does not mean eating less, by the way. Substitute high energy, low calorie foods like protein and complex carbs (vegetables, salads, fruits) for the quickly burning carbs in breads and pastas you might be eating now and leaving you hungry soon after eating them.
Exercise is a key factor in losing baby weight. Even if it’s only 10 minutes a day, consistency is the key. Start slow and increase exercise as your energy level allows and as your body responds to your new healthy diet. If you are too tired to exercise, you may not be eating enough of the right kinds of foods or getting enough rest. Talk to your doctor if you are eating right and still too tired to exercise for 10 minutes a day.
If you find that you are exercising and eating right but still struggling with weight loss because of cravings for carbs and sweets, you may need to take a look at the type of vitamins and supplements you are taking. These are important to take since we can’t get all of the nutrition we need from food.
Plus, as a new mom, you are dealing with fluctuating hormones as your body adjusts to post – baby life. Eating a good diet and exercising will help you get more energy but may not help your mood. In some cases, you might need help from supplements that can help with depression such as 5-HTP (5-hydroxytryptophan) which increases serotonin in your brain, helps you feel calmer and experience less cravings for sweets and carbohydrates. Beware of taking an antidepressant since these medications can sometimes cause weight gain.
Taking phytoestrogens (plant based compounds that have a mild estrogenic effect) may help your body deal with mild mood swings. (If you are pregnant, lactating or taking a prescription medication, make sure you check with your doctor to make sure it’s safe to take these types of supplements.)
More than anything else, you need to be gentle with yourself and not expect too much weight loss too fast. Enjoy your new baby and don’t let weight loss issues rule your life. If you are consistent in your efforts, you will lose weight and be healthy as well.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WeightLossEasily/~3/MulfMIlan2A/how-to-lose-baby-weight-3
Americans Who Watch 4.5 Hours of TV Daily Have Plenty of Time to Exercise
You don’t have time to workout, huh? Well, I have information that says otherwise. According to the Bureau of Labour we’re a busy bunch, but we’re not exactly making the most of our free time. The biggest excuse in the book for skipping exercise kind of falls apart when you see that people spend the [...]
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
The Senate passed its version of the farm bill. Now what?
It’s difficult to know what to say about a 1010-page bill that affects literally hundreds of programs, some big, some small, at such astronomical cost—an expected $97 billion per year. The bill is so big and so complex that it is unreasonable to expect legislators to understand it well enough to vote on it intelligently. Think of it as a prime example of special interests in action.
I’ve been collecting e-mailed responses from various groups. From these, it’s seems that the food movement scored a few wins along with plenty of losses.
First the wins. The United Fresh produce association is happy that the bill provides for:
- Specialty Crop Block Grants funded at $70 million per year
- Specialty Crop Research Initiative funded at $25 million in FY13; $30 million in FY14-15; $65 million in FY16; $50 million in FY17
- Plant Pest and Disease Program funded at $60 million in FY13-16 and $65 million in FY17
- Market Access Program and Technical Assistance for Specialty Crops fully funded at 2008 Farm Bill levels
- Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program fully funded at 2008 Farm Bill levels
- Hunger-Free Communities Grant Program for fruit and vegetable SNAP incentives
- Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program
- Section 32 specialty crop purchases funded at 2008 Farm Bill levels
- DoD Fresh program fully funded at $50 million per year consistent with 2008 levels
Oxfam likes two things:
- It converts the 2008 pilot program to study the effectiveness of purchasing food aid locally and regionally to a full program funded at $40 million per year.
- It tries to reduce dumping of food aid on developing country markets.
Everyone else is mixed or skeptical:
- From Food and Water Watch: “Today, the U.S. Senate passed a farm bill that left the largest agribusiness and food processing companies firmly in control of America’s food system.”
- From the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition: “While the bill includes historic commodity payment limit reforms and renewed investments in a variety of sustainable farm and food programs…[it] would benefit greatly from more agriculture reform, a greater local and regional food focus, and a much greater commitment to economic development and jobs…We are also disappointed with the $3.7 billion cut to conservation programs on working farms and ranches.”
- From the Environmental Working Group: “While we do not support this bill, we applaud the provisions that require farmers who receive crop insurance subsidies to carry out basic environmental protections on their farms and to reduce insurance subsidies for the largest and most successful agribusinesses.”
The debates over the farm bill hold some interesting lessons.
- The historic “logrolling” alliance between rural states favoring commodity support and urban states protecting food assistance programs (SNAP, food stamps) may soon come to an end. Senator Ron Johnson’s (Rep-WI) motion to separate SNAP benefits from farm supports was allowed four minutes of discussion. It failed on a vote of 59 to 40 (all Republicans). Forty? That seems like a lot.
- Labeling of genetically engineered foods remains an issue in American politics and not likely to go away. The Senate voted down an amendment to allow states to decide for themselves whether to label such foods. How will this affect the California “lets label it” initiative?
- Crop insurance will be the new focus of consumer advocacy. As Politico puts it, “the bill reflects a major shift of resources to crop insurance, which emerges as a new political powerhouse for agriculture — and what’s left of the safety net promised farmers. Midwest corn and soybean producers — riding high with good prices and a federal ethanol mandate — helped drive this change. But the result is a real and lasting split with Southern rice, peanuts and wheat growers reflected in the final vote.”
- The food movement has to get its act together. Ken Cook of the Environmental Working Group said “When conservationists stood our ground and fought, we won against the supposedly invincible crop insurance industry. Too many in the conservation community didn’t fight at all…As a consequence, conservation funding took the largest proportionate hit in this bill. For the “food movement”, the Senate farm bill has been another, rather sobering reminder that until we develop political muscle to match our passion for a sustainable food system, we’ll continue to see billions of dollars misspent on industrial agriculture.”
This is a call to action. The House is about to take up its version in the coming weeks. Advocates: get to work!
Source: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2012/06/the-senate-passed-its-version-of-the-farm-bill-now-what/
Bob Wieder Shares Reasons Why You’re Fat with Jimmy Moore
CalorieLab’s own Robert S. Wieder recently talked to Jimmy Moore of Livin’ La Vida Low Carb about his book, 115 Reasons Why It’s Not Your Fault If You’re Fat and just a few of the reasons you might be packing more pounds than you’d like.
As you might imagine from his blog’s title, Moore is a big fan of the low-carb lifestyle, so he disagrees a little bit with Bob about the gift to society that is the current ubiquitousness of bacon, but nonetheless it’s a good conversation that you should check out.
Bob says he wrote the book because of a collection of stories he’d accumulated: “The more research that I did, I kept running into articles, ‘so and so linked to obesity,’ ‘so and so linked to weight gain,’ and I started keeping a ‘so and so’ file,” he said, which eventually got so big he decided to collect them all.
He says he expected the book to be more frivolous than it ended up being, but “the more I got into it the more I came to believe that you’ve already got two strikes against you if you’re just an average American trying to maintain a decent weight” because of cultural factors beyond genetics/biological factors.
He also noted that what happens in your childhood – sometimes even before you’re born – has a big effect on whether you’ll end up overweight.
“Once you’ve gained weight it’s just a bear to try to lose it,” he said, but things like whether your mom ate junk food while she was pregnant, whether she was over 30 when you were born, if she had a Caesarean section or if you were bottle-fed after the age of 2 can all play a role in your future obesity.
“The die is cast before you’re really in charge of your life,” he said, noting that the first five to seven years of life are probably the most important in determining if someone will be fat when they’re older.
Bob and Jimmy talked about a lot of societal things that might impact a person’s weight, from the number of junk food commercials kids see to supersizing at restaurants, the use of microwaves to the use of credit cards.
And of course there are new “reasons” Bob has uncovered since the book was published, including the fact that pastel plates make you eat more (choose blue if you want to eat less). You can check out an archive of extra reasons right here at CalorieLab, or check out the book, available for the Kindle for the bargain price of $2.99. That’s just $0.026 an excuse!
(By Sarah E. White for CalorieLab Calorie Counter News)
Bob Wieder Shares Reasons Why You’re Fat with Jimmy Moore is a post from: CalorieLab - Health News & Information Blog
Source: http://calorielab.com/news/2012/06/21/bob-wieder-shares-reasons-why-youre-fat-with-jimmy-moore/
Chatting with Body Break's Hal Johnson on Coca-Cola and Participaction
 |
| Took this photo outside a local corner store |
On Saturday I had the opportunity to have a nice long chat with Hal Johnson, the iconic co-host of Body Break, and a name that for Canadians over the age of 25 is likely closely linked with ParticipACTION (a Canadian physical activity promoting NGO).
As I blogged about yesterday, Hal's tweet regarding his opposition to the ParticipACTION/Coca-Cola partnership made a bit of a splash and I wanted to explore his thoughts in more than just 140 characters. I had planned on posting it as a podcast, but given that we spoke for over an hour, I'd best distill it down to its essence.
While Hal had been aware and uncomfortable of Coca-Cola's partnership with his former employer for some time, it was at the movies with his daughter that he realized he needed to speak out. There was an advertisement for SoGo Active (embedded below) - a Canadian move more program co-sponsored by ParticipACTION and Coca-Cola.
While watching the ad Hal reports his 13 year old daughter turned to him and said,
"Dad, that doesn't seem right. Why is Coke with ParticipACTION. Isn't ParticipACTION all about health?"And so Hal sent out his tweet.
I am disappointed that Participaction has partnered with Coke, it doesn't fit no matter how much money they are getting ow.ly/bL0wl
— Hal Johnson (@bodybreak) June 22, 2012
Hal worries about the partnership,
"It sends out a mixed message, and it doesn't fit with the brand and Coke gets the halo effect of the ParticipACTION brand. It's an iconic brand and they benefit from it."I agree with Hal, and frankly so does Coca-Cola.
Here's Coca-Cola's marketing chief Joe Tripodi to the Wall Street Journal on how these sorts of partnerships benefit Coke,
"If we can get 40 million-plus fans, or even some subset of them talking positively about the about the things we’re doing, ultimately that’s a good thing for us”And by "good thing" Mr. Tripodi means sales,
"I think it’s probably a leading indicator of potential sales."And what kind of sales does Mr. Tripodi hope for? He told CNBC in 2011,
"We want to double our business in basically a decade."As for the message being promoted by Sogo Active to Canadian youth in a ParticipACTION/Coca-Cola cobranding? It's pretty clear the message is in Coca-Cola's best interest too, because the message SoGo Active is actively promoting is that obesity isn't about food, it's about fitness - it's not the Coca-Cola, it's the internet. And to tackle obesity, what does Sogo Active recommend? Here's an official SoGo promotional video and its roughly 13 year old spokesperson explaining it's all about laziness,
"The obesity rate is going to skyrocket and the only way for us to change that is to get off our butt"
You know I fully understand why Coca-Cola would want to double its sales in the next 10 years. What's completely lost on me is why ParticipACTION would want to help them to do so.
Hal sums up my feelings about the ParticipACTION's partnership with Coca-Cola perfectly,
"I think it's wrong. There's no question it's wrong. And that's why I said it. And I believe it and I certainly would not back down from that."Me neither Hal, and thanks for speaking up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)